You Named Psychological Safety. You Didn’t Create It.

by Jon Plotner

Psychological safety is having a moment. Gen Z is going no-contact with parents because they don’t feel safe. Employees are disengaging — or quietly quitting — because speaking up feels too risky. The phrase is everywhere: in leadership podcasts, culture decks, HR trainings, and social media threads.

But here’s what I’ve noticed after years of coaching executives and teams: we’re really good at naming psychological safety. We’re not very good at creating it.

So let’s fix that.

Amy Edmondson, consistently ranked among the world’s top management thinkers on the Thinkers50 list, gave us the definition that still holds after her landmark 1999 research:

“A belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up with ideas, questions, concerns, or mistakes.”

My friend and mentor Jenni Catron — USA Today bestselling author of Culture Matters: A Framework for Helping Your Team Grow, Thrive, and Be Unstoppable and founder of The 4Sight Group — identifies psychological safety as one of five critical elements of a healthy culture. In our work coaching leaders and organizations, we find the same root issue again and again: dysfunctional teams don’t lack talent or strategy. They lack an environment where people feel safe enough to tell the truth.

Research is easy to agree with. Behavior change is harder.

In a recent 4Sight Group training, Jenni and I unpacked seven behaviors that actually move the needle. These aren’t personality traits you either have or don’t — they’re learnable, practicable, and leader-driven. And that last part matters. Leaders set the temperature of every room they enter. Which means the work starts with you.

Self-Awareness

It’s not a coincidence this one comes first. Without it, you can’t accurately assess your ability to do any of what follows.

Self-awareness isn’t just knowing yourself — it operates on three levels. Awareness of yourself. Awareness of others in the room. And the one most leaders underestimate: awareness of how others experience your leadership.

I’ve heard great leaders ask this question of the people they lead: “What’s it like on the other side of me?” It’s a simple question. It’s also one of the most courageous things a leader can ask — because the honest answer might be uncomfortable.

One practical discipline that’s made a real difference for me: build a 3-5 minute buffer before meetings. Don’t walk straight from your last call into the next room. Settle. Breathe. Prepare mentally — even prayerfully. You can’t read a room you haven’t showed up to yet.

If you don’t know what it’s like on the other side of you, ask someone who will tell you the truth. Then actually listen.

Curiosity

Here’s what happens as you climb the organizational chart: you get further from the truth. The decisions you’re making are increasingly disconnected from what’s actually happening on the ground — and if you don’t know that, you’ll keep making the wrong calls with high confidence.

Curiosity is the antidote. It slows the snap judgment. It makes space for the parts of the picture you’re missing.

But here’s something I’ve noticed that goes deeper than just better information: curiosity develops the people around you. When you ask instead of direct, you’re not just gathering data — you’re helping your team learn to think. Leaders who are curious create other leaders. Leaders who just give answers create followers.

When I feel the pull to give an answer quickly — and I feel it too — I’ve learned to pause and ask instead. The most powerful questions are often the simplest:

“Tell me more. Help me understand. What’s the backstory?”

The answers you need are usually already in the room. Curiosity is just how you get to them.

Consistent Affirmation

Hard conversations are hard. That’s not an insight — it’s just true. And when someone takes the risk of stepping into one — raising the difficult issue, respectfully disagreeing, naming what everyone else is avoiding — what you do in that moment determines everything about what happens next.

If the brave moment passes without acknowledgment, people register the lesson: it wasn’t worth it. But if you pause and name what just happened — “Right there. That took courage. That’s exactly what we need more of.” — you’ve just shifted the culture, even slightly, in the right direction.

What gets rewarded gets repeated. It’s that simple. Call out bravery in real time, and you’ll get more of it.

Vulnerability (Going First)

Most leaders I coach carry some version of the same fear: if I show weakness, I’ll lose respect. It’s understandable. It’s also wrong.

Brené Brown’s research on this is definitive:

“Vulnerability is not weakness. It is our greatest measure of courage.”

In her work on daring leadership, Brown draws a clear line between leaders who armor up — projecting certainty, never admitting doubt, avoiding the hard conversation — and leaders who go first. Armored leaders build cultures of performance and fear. Daring leaders build cultures of trust and candor.

Going first sounds like: “I was wrong. I don’t know. I might be missing something here.” Or even: “I’m going to think out loud for a minute — and I might disagree with myself before I’m done.” It feels risky. It’s actually the most trust-building thing you can do.

One important nuance: vulnerability isn’t oversharing. It’s calibrated. Who’s in the room, the maturity of the team, the organizational context — these all matter. The goal isn’t to unload; it’s to model. You can’t ask people to go where you won’t go yourself.

Naming the Elephant

Every team has them — the things everyone knows but nobody says. The unspoken tension. The pattern that never gets addressed. The decision everyone privately questions but publicly supports.

These elephants don’t go away because we step around them. They go underground. And underground problems get more expensive.

Psychologically safe cultures do something specific: they take what’s undiscussable and make it discussable. When I see something in a room that others are clearly avoiding, I name it — not to create conflict, but to open a door. The sequence I use:

“Here’s what I’m observing… Is this the culture we want to create? What are we going to do about it?”

And here’s something worth noting: you don’t have to have the answer to name the elephant. In fact, waiting until you have a solution is often why leaders never name it at all. Name it first. The conversation that follows is what surfaces the path forward.

Psychological safety isn’t the absence of hard conversations. It’s the presence of leaders willing to start them.

Relational and Physical Access

I’ve been in organizations where the senior leader only appeared when something was wrong. You knew it the moment he walked in — the room shifted. Nobody said anything out loud, but the feeling was immediate: someone’s in trouble. His presence had become a warning signal, not a source of safety. Not because he was a bad person, but because access had never been built.

I’ve also worked alongside a leader who blocked time every Thursday afternoon to walk the halls. No agenda. No performance review in disguise. Just presence. He’d stop and talk when the moment felt right. Over time, when he showed up, the anxiety didn’t. He had built relational access long before he ever needed it — and when harder moments came, people trusted him because they actually knew him.

Access has to be built before crisis, not during it. Closed doors, packed calendars, and guarded body language all send a message. So does showing up when nothing is wrong. And here’s the thing leaders miss: when you’re inaccessible, you don’t just lose access to people. You lose access to reality.

Inclusion (Lack of Privilege)

Safety isn’t a resource for the loudest people in the room. It belongs to everyone — regardless of age, gender, race, tenure, role, or background.

One of the most revealing things a leader can do is simply watch: who’s speaking, and who isn’t? Who takes up space in every conversation? Whose voice is rarely heard — and why? Those patterns aren’t random. They’re a map of who actually feels safe.

In my experience, the quietest people in the room are often carrying the most important perspectives. They’ve just learned — somewhere, at some point — that speaking up wasn’t worth the risk. That’s not a them problem. That’s a culture problem.

Great leaders make deliberate space. They notice the quiet and invite it in: “I haven’t heard from you — what do you think?” Without full participation, you’re only getting part of the picture. And the part you’re missing is usually the part you most need to hear.

Safety Doesn’t Just Happen

Here’s what I want you to take away: psychological safety isn’t created by naming it. It isn’t created by research citations or culture decks or a value on the wall. It is created — intentionally, consistently, over time — by leaders who set the temperature and choose to go first.

These seven behaviors aren’t a checklist. They’re a direction. Pick one. Practice it in your next team meeting. Pay attention to what shifts.

Because when people actually believe it’s safe to speak up — everything changes.


Jon Plotner is a Lead Culture Strategist with The 4Sight Group and Executive Pastor of Operations at Bethany Community Church. He coaches executive leaders and teams in culture development, organizational health, and leadership formation.

Written By Jon Plotner

Related Posts

a man sitting at a table talking to a woman

Stop Fixing the Symptom. Start Having the Conversation.

Why most organizational conflict stays stuck — and the harder, more honest path to resolution. There is a conversation that needs to happen in your organization right now. You probably already know what it is. You’ve been circling it for weeks, maybe months. You’ve...

read more...
green plants on soil

Two Types of Leaders: Which One Are You?

In all my years of coaching leaders — executives, pastors, ministry professionals, and marketplace leaders — I've noticed a pattern that never changes. It doesn't matter what industry you're in, what size your organization is, or how long you've been in leadership....

read more...
train, mountains, fields, rice fields, rice plantation, rice farm, rice paddies, railway, railroad, railway system, passenger train, transport, rural, countryside, landscape, nature

The System vs. Your Soul: How Senior Leaders Reframe Criticism

High-capacity, high-care leaders often risk tying their identity too closely to outcomes and other people’s reactions. When ownership increases, so does emotional exposure, causing feedback to land on your identity instead of just your role. This post shares a framework to build durable internal boundaries, allowing you to keep listening deeply without absorbing criticism as a personal verdict. The core practice is a crucial mental reframe: treating feedback as shared insight about the system we’re all in, not a critique of your worth. Learn how to set internal boundary rules, use cognitive defusion to create distance from sharp thoughts, and implement a repeatable process for transforming tough conversations into raw material for shared learning.

read more...
The Eye of the Storm: Why the Best Leaders are Carriers of the Calm

The Eye of the Storm: Why the Best Leaders are Carriers of the Calm

In navigating the complexities of leadership, one must recognize that the true essence of influence lies not just in decision-making but in the energy we radiate; the most impactful leaders harness a thoughtful stillness that invites connection and collaboration, ensuring their teams feel supported rather than strained, inspiring a collective resilience that transcends mere survival and fosters an environment where creativity flourishes and potential is fully realized, highlighting that the ultimate goal of leadership is not to command but to cultivate an atmosphere where every voice can rise, contributing to a symphony of shared success.

read more...
multi cultural people

Support & Leadership: Fostering Ownership and Partnership for Results

Yesterday, I attended a customer meeting with one of our customer success managers, and it turned into a real eye-opener about what leadership should be. My colleague shared on LinkedIn that instead of needing more oversight, Individual Contributors just want ownership and support. When leaders show up, they’re not just a title; they create trust and momentum. It’s key for leaders to champion decisions and support their teams without judgment. Leaders should empower rather than evaluate. The goal is to fuse the roles of leaders and ICs, promoting shared ownership and respect, so everyone wins together. It’s all about partnership, not hierarchy.

read more...
Patience in Bloom: Why Waiting Matters

Patience in Bloom: Why Waiting Matters

The story of a pink rhododendron that took six years to bloom serves as a metaphor for personal growth. Despite consistent care, it initially showed no visible signs of progress. This spring, it burst into beautiful blossoms, prompting reflections on life’s invisible growth periods. Just as the rhododendron established its roots before blooming, we too can spend long periods working hard without immediate results. This emphasizes that patience and continued effort are essential, as many projects and goals develop quietly beneath the surface. The waiting time is not wasted, and eventually, each person’s ‘moment of blooming’ will arrive.

read more...

0 Comments

Leave a Reply